Multiple US Cities Reject or Restrict Flock Safety Cameras

Local governments across the United States rejected or restricted the use of Flock Safety license plate reader cameras on September 22 and 23, 2026, citing privacy concerns and public distrust. In Horace, the City Council voted 3-1 to remove the cameras, while the Monroe City Council in Ohio voted unanimously to terminate its contract and prohibit future funding for the system. In Monterey County, California, supervisors blocked a 10-year, $1.7 million contract renewal for 63 cameras, directing staff to explore a county-owned alternative.

Other jurisdictions opted for compromise or faced civil unrest. Watsonville, California, reduced its camera count from 37 to 20 and shortened data retention from 30 days to seven. In Springfield, Missouri, a City Council meeting ended in the arrest of two individuals after Mayor Jeff Schrag blocked public comment on a camera review resolution. Meanwhile, Norfolk, Nebraska, held discussions where residents questioned the cost and privacy implications of the technology.

Law enforcement officials consistently defended the systems as vital tools for solving crimes and locating missing persons. Cass County Sheriff Jesse Jahner argued the cameras are essential as Horace grows and faces violent crime, while Norfolk Police Chief Brian Tighe stated the technology provides critical leads that move cases forward. Opponents, including Horace Councilmember Chad Chalmers, argued that the benefits are often presented without considering the long-term privacy risks and lack of transparency.