ThinkPatternGet the app
Story
WORLD · SEP 16, 2026

The New York Times Deletes Line Questioning Israeli Victimhood

The New York Times removed a sentence from an article after critics argued it framed Israeli victimhood during the October 7 attacks as a subjective perception.

The New York Times removed a sentence from a news report on Wednesday after intense criticism that the phrasing questioned whether Israelis were the actual victims of the October 7, 2023, Hamas terror attacks. The article, written by reporter Isabel Kershner, focused on a documentary titled "NAZA" which alleged the Israel Defense Forces used AI-powered systems to indiscriminately kill Palestinian civilians, a claim the military denied.

The controversial line stated that Israelis "still largely view themselves as the victims of Oct. 7." Critics, including journalist Eitan Fischberger, pundit Scott Jennings, and the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis, argued the wording portrayed an objective fact as a matter of perception or a "mentality." Following contact from Fox News Digital and other watchdog groups, the newspaper deleted the line.

The New York Times issued an editor's note attributing the phrasing to an "editing error." The publication explained the sentence was intended to describe perceptions of the government's military response rather than the experience of the attacks themselves. This incident occurred as the newspaper challenged a Yale School of Management study alleging systematic bias against Israel in its coverage of the Israel-Gaza war.


Reported across 15 outlets
Actors
The New York Times

Keep reading in the app

The full story and every source, free in the app.

Download on the App StoreComing soonGoogle Play