Bipartisan Backlash Targets Data Centers and Surveillance Cameras
U.S. critics are protesting the expansion of data centers and Flock surveillance cameras, citing coercive state power and noise pollution.
A bipartisan movement in the United States is protesting the rapid proliferation of data centers and the installation of Flock surveillance cameras in urban environments. Opponents argue these expansions are not organic market developments but are instead imposed by a corporatized ruling class working in coordination with state power.
Critics specifically cite the use of eminent domain to seize land for data center construction and the resulting noise pollution as primary grievances. Regarding the deployment of Flock cameras, opponents characterize the technology as a control grid designed for population surveillance rather than a tool for crime control.
Jeffrey Tucker Jastrow, an author and commentator, frames this resistance as a reaction to the coercive imposition of progress. He draws parallels between these current technological expansions and historical forced industrializations, such as the British Enclosure Acts and the industrialization of the American South following the Civil War.