U.S. District Judges Increasingly Reject Trump Mandatory Detention Policy
Federal judges are ordering the release of immigrants held without bond, challenging the Trump administration's mandatory detention policy before a pending Supreme Court review.
Federal district judges are increasingly overturning the Trump administration's mandatory detention policy, which requires the incarceration of immigrants who entered the country illegally without the possibility of bond. A review of habeas petition cases decided on June 16 indicates a strong trend toward release, with judges ordering release or bond hearings 142 times compared to only 36 denials.
U.S. District Judges have ruled that indefinite detention without individualized justification is unconstitutional. Judge Keith Ellison ordered the immediate release of Gilberto Pacheco, citing an unconstitutional deprivation of liberty, while Judge Jason K. Pulliam ordered five releases in a single day, calling the detentions unlawful. Conversely, some judges continue to uphold the policy; Judge John L. Sinatra has denied multiple release requests, and Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen recently denied a bond hearing for a Venezuelan asylum seeker.
The legal conflict persists across different jurisdictions, with some appointees in Utah, New York, Puerto Rico, and Texas maintaining the policy. The Supreme Court of the United States is expected to hear a case as soon as October to resolve these conflicting appeals court rulings following a request from the U.S. solicitor general.