Judge Freezes DOJ Subpoenas for New York Times Journalists
A federal judge froze U.S. Department of Justice subpoenas for New York Times journalists' phone records used to identify confidential sources.
U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian froze the enforcement of phone records subpoenas issued by the U.S. Department of Justice after the agency sought data from several New York Times journalists and their family members. The investigation aims to identify confidential sources who leaked information regarding security concerns over a Qatari-gifted Air Force One jet, which prompted President Donald Trump to use an older aircraft for a NATO summit in Turkey.
The New York Times filed a motion to quash the subpoenas, alleging the government acted in bad faith. The news organization argued that the Department ignored protocols by requesting records dating back to January 1, 2026, which precedes the publication of the relevant articles. The company claims this timeframe suggests the government is foraging for information about journalist-source relationships more broadly rather than focusing on the specific leaks.
The Department of Justice defended its actions by asserting that those leaking classified information are the actual targets of the probe. U.S. Attorney in Manhattan Jay Clayton testified that the government followed established protocols. This legal dispute follows a period of escalating tension between the executive branch and the press, including a prior FBI raid on a Washington Post reporter's home.